Current Issues

Regular Industry Development Updates, Opinions and Talking Points relating to Manufacturing, the Supply Chain and Logistics.

What Is Planning?

13-Mar-2018
What Is Planning?
Cloud. Descriptive analytics. Prescriptive analytics. Machine learning. Collaborative workflow. What-if analysis. I find, as I attend conferences, that the word ‘planning’ is bandied about, but few technologists dive into the details. We have lost the ability to have a discussion on the fundamentals. It drives a supply chain planning gal like me crazy. Here I share some insights on planning. For everyone trying to navigate new technology options, this is an important question.

A Look Back
The traditional world of supply chain planning managed inputs into a data model to drive outputs. While we can argue about which technologies have the best role-based usability and what-if analysis, the key to the selection of supply chain planning is the fit of the data model and the ability to drive an output that drives business value. A mistake that many companies make is a focus on implementation. Instead, it was about fine-tuning and model configuration. The goal should not be about speed to implementation. Instead, it should be about the “success of the model output” to drive value.

With the evolution of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms and the zealous implementations of many business consultants, the basics of planning were lost. As companies focused on the hype cycle of the “integrated supply chain model,” the projects were large and complex. The focus by IT on implementation often left a business leadership team with a tool that they could not use.

Evolution Issues

Today, the client-server technology vendors are moving to cloud-based deployments. However, companies like JDA, Logility, Oracle, and SAP are hamstrung by software maintenance upgrades, promises to customers, and evolution. One of the largest blights in the market is the SAP evolution of APO and the lack of clarity of the roadmap. APO became the market leader despite the lack of functionality, and the IBP roadmap makes this worse.

In parallel, companies seeking a path forward are being deluged by “schema on read” technologies, cognitive computing, prescriptive analytics and machine learning which is largely making the traditional planning world obsolete. The traditional engines were based on linear optimization. As supply chains grow more complex (with an increase in items, and lumpy demand due to globalization), they are increasingly becoming more nonlinear. This requires deeper modeling and the use of channel data. Linear optimization assumes a normal distribution of data. For the distributions that are not normal, machine learning and cognitive computing are gaining traction. (Credit for this image goes to ToolsGroup. I liked their image.) The point is that the area in blue represents high-volume items that typically represent statistics based on a normal distribution. Traditional supply chain engines assumed a normal distribution which is increasingly becoming a smaller data set.

Figure 1. The Long Tail of the Supply Chain Requires Deeper Engines Using Nonlinear Optimization

In addition, as business becomes more complex, the assets are more utilized and the business has more manufacturing constraints. Constraint-based supply requires deeper modeling of manufacturing and network modeling. The business teams struggle to keep skilled planners. There is a need for a connection from the core planning world of supply planning to business leadership capabilities with mature collaborative workflows and “what-if” capabilities. In a global organization, there are typically different needs for three core roles as shown in Figure 2. Core planners need deep models while business users need “what-if” capabilities connected to the models along with a “collaborative workflow.” The core planners need deep modeling and access to clean master data. This is an issue for most companies. Traditional Advanced Planning focused on core planners but not usability by business leaders and senior management. Technologies like Anaplan, Halo and Kinaxis improve visibility for these key roles.

Figure 2. Planning Requirements Vary by Role

Technology Acceleration
As we move forward, there is a lot of discussion on descriptive analytics and the ability to get data. There is also a lot of hype on “connected planning.” However, I scratch my head. How can we have connected planning if the organizations are not aligned, and do not have a balanced scorecard that crosses across the company to drive functional alignment?

Figure 3. Organizational Alignment

Collaborative sales planning introduced in the last decade increased error and bias. Asking sales for a forecast is vastly different than sensing the market based on channel data. To win, companies must get aligned cross-functionally on the role of the budget, and drive alignment on the strategic plan.

The technology market is moving in two directions (deeper modeling through cognitive computing and greater visibility through descriptive analytics). In this evolution, confusion reigns. This includes hands-free planning with “schema on read” machine learning and easy-to-use descriptive analytics with easy “what-if analysis” that is not anchored with deeper modeling. These are polar opposite pulls that actually need to be brought together. With the confusion on the SAP migration plan for 2025, more and more companies are in the market looking for solutions. The frenzy is high and the increased confusion on the technology options increase the number of questions. As you try to navigate the market don’t forget the basics.

Planning Basics
Whenever someone uses the term “real-time planning” raise a red flag. Planning is not, and should not be, real-time. Attempting to do planning in real-time will add nervousness and error into the planning processes. Don’t confuse sensing and translation with planning. Avoid any process that is described as real-time planning.

Planning time horizons exist for a reason. They are the natural boundary for global versus local planning governance. The best teams define governance and are clear on time horizons. There are natural processes which require a tactical horizon for procurement buying transportation sourcing, and Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP). In the tactical time horizon, shifting and aligning manufacturing loads across factories is critical. If you are a regional or a small company, tactical planning is not as critical. The best companies are great at strategic network design and translate this to a global planning team that sets the network for a longer period of 18-24 months. Being good at tactical planning is essential for managing costs. The shorter-term horizon of 0-12 weeks benefits by faster planning planning cycles but short-term operational planning is not sufficient to manage the supply chain. It is best when complemented by strategic and tactical planning. In addition, cognitive computing and the redefinition of workflows for “multiple ifs” to “multiple thens” is transformational for the redefinition of Available-to-Promise (ATP), allocation, and inventory management workflows. Don’t make the mistake of eliminating time horizons. Use new technology options to improve hand-offs and visibility and reduce planning batch cycles.

Test but verify. The use of deeper engines and workflows can improve outcomes, but only if we test and learn. Never treat a planning project as an implementation. Test. Learn. Evolve. So often, companies forget to configure the system and test the output of the planning engines.

Sales-driven processes are not market driven. Marketing-driven processes are not market driven. Market-driven processes are outside in starting with the customer and translating data back into the organization as a usable demand signal. The best results happen when the focus is on the market, using channel data, not on functional planning. Aggressively build outside-in processes.

As you consider the options, it is important that you ask the question “What is planning?” Don’t accept historic views of planning limitations, but don’t forget the basics. And, if you have questions, let us know.

App Insights: How can artificial intelligence innovate supply chain management?
1 week ago
Managing Technological Change Without any Supply Chain Disruption
1 week ago
Moody’s Blues for House of Fraser; but Website Failings are Just as Damaging
1 week ago
Artificial Intelligence: What’s Now And Next In IoT-driven Supply Chain Innovation
2 weeks ago
Indiana Jones and the supply chain bullwhip effect
2 weeks ago
How Enterprise Labeling Helps You Conquer Regulatory Challenges
2 weeks ago
3 Tips for Empowering Millennial Warehouse Workers
2 weeks ago
More robots means easier delivery - but what about the infrastructure?
2 weeks ago
Safety in the warehouse: Five key risk areas for 360-degree protection
3 weeks ago
Automotive resilience, not just airbags and crash tests, but IT too
3 weeks ago
New High Street panel is facing a race against a terminal diagnosis
3 weeks ago
Delivering the supply chain revolution
3 weeks ago
A market of one: the potential of the personalized supply chain
4 weeks ago
5 EIS rules you are probably not aware of
4 weeks ago
TMS: an enterprise priority
1 month ago
Labeling Solutions for Global Expansion
1 month ago
Prime Day will be a $1.6bn loss-leader creating millions more Prime members, says e-commerce expert
1 month ago
Say what? The new possibilities of voice and machine driven retail
1 month ago
‘Peak faith’ in the cloud only 12-18 months away with slump to follow, warns 6point6 Cloud Gateway
1 month ago
As you were for UK manufacturing sector, but new business growth at three month high
1 month ago
Back to IoT basics: Automating outcomes to improve customer experience
1 month ago
Investigation of the "Fast Fashion" impact
1 month ago
Redefining Rental for Materials Handling Equipment
1 month ago
With the Intelligent Enterprise, SAP Creates “A Completely Different Kind of Flexibility”
1 month ago
The supply chain is only as strong as its weakest link
1 month ago
How to Streamline Labeling in the Pharma Space
1 month ago
‘A revolution happened in the way we buy services last week – and no one has noticed!’
1 month ago
Hot Topics at GS1 Connect? Labeling, Blockchain and More
1 month ago
Retailers must Embrace Change
1 month ago
Labeling Solutions That Bridge Islands of Data
2 months ago
My Journey to the World’s Most Important Gathering of Supply Chain Leaders
2 months ago
Workforce of the Future
2 months ago
Securing your supply chain against political uncertainty
2 months ago
On-demand warehousing could help retailers score big this summer
2 months ago
Half of organisations set for major procurement and supply chain AI investment within two years
2 months ago
Brexit, the weather & online shopping: How Britain’s favourite conversations are shaping supply chains
2 months ago
The Road to Regulatory Compliance for Your Supply Chain Labeling
2 months ago
The War on Packaging
2 months ago
Five data dramas that keep your CIO awake at night
2 months ago
As sales fall new report finds many department stores’ websites suffer from clunky integration and poor delive
2 months ago
Got Your Surfboards Ready to Master the Wave of Digitalization?
2 months ago
TrustArc to Offer IAPP Privacy Core® GDPR Training to Address Compliance Requirements
2 months ago
The Market has never been Stronger for Horizontal and Vertical API Platforms
2 months ago
Selecting the best Transport Management System - One of the most important logistics decisions you’ll make
2 months ago
“Digital Transformation” and Supply Chain Planning
2 months ago
Coolest Advice for Making Blockbuster IoT Devices?
2 months ago
The Fall of ‘Made in China’
2 months ago
How can artificial intelligence help the food industry?
3 months ago
Streamlining Operations With Waveless Picking
3 months ago