Current Issues

Regular Industry Development Updates, Opinions and Talking Points relating to Manufacturing, the Supply Chain and Logistics.

Successful Freight Match Takes Intelligence

21-Feb-2018
Successful Freight Match Takes Intelligence
The freight industry is not short of ‘load boards’ that claim to match spare carrier capacity with shippers’ requirements. But load boards have significant shortcomings – they are at best only partly automated, they lack intelligence, and they don’t actually make matches.

Testing against criteria is limited
Like other search sites, such as dating and property, load boards try to pair supply and demand by testing against several criteria. For property, searches may be by price band, number of bedrooms, location, off road parking, etc. For freight, it could be times, start and end locations, weight/volume and other factors. If a data set fails one of these go/no go tests it is rejected or pushed down the rankings. Typically, these systems struggle to produce a ranking based on more than one criterion.

Critically, the output is also not a best match, but merely a list of offers that meet all or some of the requirements. The laborious process for the system user is to balance significant or conflicting factors objectively, to decide if and where compromises might be acceptable, and even whether to rerun the search with different requirements. Then, of course, there is the issue of the shipper and vendor having to manually agree prices and contracts.

Interaction needs to be realtime
A further problem is that shippers and carriers are often not interacting in real time. Someone must create and upload details of requirement/capacity and take them down again, but timing is everything. By the time the shipper has manually evaluated responses, the carrier capacity may already have been reassigned. Very short-term opportunities may never make it onto the board at all, and most postings are ‘last resort’ rather than ‘first opportunity’.

The entire process is long-winded, labour-intensive, costly and slow, yet still does not guarantee finding the best possible match.

Digital freight matching, does the work for you
What is needed is an intelligent, digital system designed for the digital freight world – not just a better load board. It will use machine-to-machine (M2M) interfaces to capture and upload shipper requirements and carrier availability, as soon as they are defined or changed on the users’ own systems and supplemented by stored cross reference (x-ref) data.

Using an intelligent algorithmic approach, the system would discover best matches based on the full range of shipper criteria, ranging from corporate framework to load or lane specific requirements – all against defined business rules.

Using carrier charging data and information on road networks, congestion etc, (all based on vehicle profiles) the system would optimise routes. Additionally, where required, other factors such as transit time, performance, carbon emission and price can be factored in, weighted according to need. While ever the requirement is ‘active’ (and unless first match has been chosen), with each change of shipper requirement or carrier capacity, the system continuously re-evaluates all opportunities to create the best match.

Such a system is fast, ‘always on’, always communicating and always working with live data. There are no capacity limits to the number of potential pairings it can analyse, and it can apply rules to the weighting of multiple factors, in an objective way with no commercial inducements. Costly, time-consuming and error prone manual processes are eliminated. And significantly, with machine rather than human matching, users do not have to post commercial information for all to see.

Thankfully, such a Digital Freight Matching process now exists and forms the core of TGMatrix’ intelligent freight solution, bringing shippers and carriers together in a digitalised age in a seamless process that delivers easily realisable benefits.

For further information visit www.tgmatrix.com

The Time to Modernize Your Artwork Management is Now
4 days ago
It’s time to bin receipts: ParcelHero calls for an end to wasteful paper receipts
5 days ago
Ocado sales jump thanks to 'automation done right'
6 days ago
Preparing your employees for Industry 4.0
1 week ago
How Do Product and Shipping Labels Affect Brand Visibility?
1 week ago
How will Brexit affect the events industry?
1 week ago
100 days to Christmas - ParcelCompare says it’s never too early to start planning those presents and orders
1 week ago
It’s time to blow up your business model and switch to DTC
1 week ago
How retailers can survive the death of the high street
1 week ago
ClickSoftware Announces Recent Customer Wins, Product Updates and Industry Accolades
1 week ago
Deloitte increases its focus on AI & Marketing Technology through new acquisition
1 week ago
How Centralized Labeling Helps QA Departments
1 week ago
How IoT is Changing the Waste Water Industry
1 week ago
M&A can put quality compliance at risk
2 weeks ago
Chinese traders must pay fair postal charges or more British retailers will collapse
2 weeks ago
Enhance real-time visibility across your operation with a proof of delivery system
2 weeks ago
Snapfulfil publishes top five tips for winning at warehousing
2 weeks ago
Government’s no-deal Brexit advice papers ‘are the equivalent of “duck and cover” nuclear warnings’
1 month ago
Brexit and Stockpiling: What’s the answer?
1 month ago
Peak? Which peak?
1 month ago
Empowering Your Supply Chain Workforce: 3 Tips for Manufacturing Directors
1 month ago
64 per cent of manufacturers rate their shop-floor IT capabilities as just average, weak or non-existent
1 month ago
The supply chain lessons of the modern grocer
1 month ago
Time to mitigate the risk of a ‘no-deal’ Brexit?
1 month ago
App Insights: How can artificial intelligence innovate supply chain management?
1 month ago
Managing Technological Change Without any Supply Chain Disruption
1 month ago
Moody’s Blues for House of Fraser; but Website Failings are Just as Damaging
1 month ago
Artificial Intelligence: What’s Now And Next In IoT-driven Supply Chain Innovation
1 month ago
Indiana Jones and the supply chain bullwhip effect
1 month ago
How Enterprise Labeling Helps You Conquer Regulatory Challenges
1 month ago
3 Tips for Empowering Millennial Warehouse Workers
1 month ago
More robots means easier delivery - but what about the infrastructure?
1 month ago
Safety in the warehouse: Five key risk areas for 360-degree protection
2 months ago
Automotive resilience, not just airbags and crash tests, but IT too
2 months ago
New High Street panel is facing a race against a terminal diagnosis
2 months ago
Delivering the supply chain revolution
2 months ago
A market of one: the potential of the personalized supply chain
2 months ago
5 EIS rules you are probably not aware of
2 months ago
TMS: an enterprise priority
2 months ago
Labeling Solutions for Global Expansion
2 months ago
Prime Day will be a $1.6bn loss-leader creating millions more Prime members, says e-commerce expert
2 months ago
Say what? The new possibilities of voice and machine driven retail
2 months ago
‘Peak faith’ in the cloud only 12-18 months away with slump to follow, warns 6point6 Cloud Gateway
2 months ago
As you were for UK manufacturing sector, but new business growth at three month high
2 months ago
Back to IoT basics: Automating outcomes to improve customer experience
2 months ago
Investigation of the "Fast Fashion" impact
2 months ago
Redefining Rental for Materials Handling Equipment
3 months ago
With the Intelligent Enterprise, SAP Creates “A Completely Different Kind of Flexibility”
3 months ago
The supply chain is only as strong as its weakest link
3 months ago